What Is the Dividend Growth Model? Formula & Examples

DividendRanks Research8 min read

Key Takeaways

  • The Dividend Growth Model (Gordon Growth Model) values a stock based on its future dividends growing at a constant rate.
  • The formula is: P = D1 / (r - g), where D1 is next year's dividend, r is the required return, and g is the dividend growth rate.
  • It works best for mature, stable dividend payers like KO, PG, and JNJ.
  • The model breaks down when the growth rate approaches or exceeds the required rate of return.

The Dividend Growth Model — also known as the Gordon Growth Model (GGM) — is a stock valuation method that calculates a stock's intrinsic value based on the present value of its future dividend payments, assuming those dividends grow at a constant rate forever. It is one of the most elegant and widely taught valuation models in finance, and despite its simplicity, it provides a useful framework for thinking about what a dividend stock is worth. The core formula is straightforward:

P = D1 / (r - g)

Where P is the fair value of the stock, D1 is the expected dividend per share one year from now, r is the required rate of return (or discount rate), and g is the constant annual dividend growth rate. The model assumes dividends grow at rate g forever, which is why it works best for stable, mature companies with long track records of consistent dividend growth.

A Step-by-Step Example with Coca-Cola

Let us walk through a real-world example using Coca-Cola (KO). Suppose Coca-Cola's current annual dividend is $1.94 per share, and we expect it to grow at 4% per year (roughly in line with its 5-year average). If our required rate of return is 9% (a common equity discount rate), we calculate:

  • D1 = $1.94 x (1 + 0.04) = $2.018
  • r = 0.09 (9%)
  • g = 0.04 (4%)
  • P = $2.018 / (0.09 - 0.04) = $2.018 / 0.05 = $40.36

This suggests Coca-Cola's intrinsic value is about $40 per share under these assumptions. If the current market price is $62, the model suggests the stock is overvalued — or that the market is pricing in a lower required return, higher growth rate, or both. This highlights a key feature of the model: the output is extremely sensitive to the inputs, especially the difference between r and g.

Sensitivity to Inputs

The denominator (r - g) is the critical variable. Small changes in either the required return or the growth rate produce enormous changes in the calculated value. Using the same Coca-Cola example:

  • If r = 8% and g = 4%: P = $2.018 / 0.04 = $50.45
  • If r = 7% and g = 4%: P = $2.018 / 0.03 = $67.27
  • If r = 9% and g = 5%: P = $2.037 / 0.04 = $50.93
  • If r = 9% and g = 3%: P = $1.998 / 0.06 = $33.30

A 1% change in the required return swings the fair value by 25-50%. This sensitivity is both the model's greatest weakness and its most important lesson: valuation is fundamentally about assumptions, and reasonable people can disagree significantly about what a stock is worth.

When the Model Works Well

The Dividend Growth Model is most reliable for companies that exhibit these characteristics:

  • Long dividend history: Companies like Procter & Gamble and Johnson & Johnson with 50+ years of consecutive increases have demonstrated remarkably consistent growth rates.
  • Mature, stable businesses: Companies in consumer staples, utilities, and healthcare tend to grow dividends at relatively predictable rates.
  • Growth rate below required return: The math only works if g < r. If a company's dividends are growing at 12% per year, the model produces a negative denominator and breaks down.

Limitations and Alternatives

The model has well-known limitations. The assumption of constant perpetual growth is unrealistic — no company grows at exactly the same rate forever. The model cannot value non-dividend-paying stocks (like Berkshire Hathaway or most tech companies). And as shown above, the output is hypersensitive to input assumptions.

The two-stage dividend growth model addresses some limitations by allowing for a high-growth phase followed by a stable-growth phase. For example, you might model a company growing dividends at 10% for five years before settling into a permanent 4% growth rate. This multi-stage approach produces more realistic valuations for companies in transition.

Despite its limitations, the Gordon Growth Model remains valuable as a quick sanity check, a teaching tool for understanding what drives stock prices, and a starting point for more sophisticated analysis. For dividend investors, it reinforces the key insight that a stock's value is ultimately determined by the cash it returns to shareholders — and how quickly that cash grows.

Frequently Asked Questions

What if the growth rate is higher than the required return?

If g exceeds r, the denominator becomes negative, and the formula produces a meaningless negative value. This indicates the model's assumption of constant perpetual growth is inappropriate for the stock. In reality, no company can sustain dividend growth rates above the cost of equity indefinitely — the growth rate must eventually slow to below r. Use a multi-stage model for high-growth dividend stocks.

How do I determine the required rate of return (r)?

The required return reflects the minimum return you demand for investing in the stock given its risk. Common approaches include the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which uses the risk-free rate plus a risk premium based on the stock's beta. A simpler approach is to use the historical average equity return of 9-10% and adjust up for riskier stocks or down for very stable ones.

Can I use the Gordon Growth Model for REITs?

Yes, REITs are actually excellent candidates for the Gordon Growth Model because they are required to distribute at least 90% of taxable income as dividends. REITs like Realty Income (O) have predictable, growing distributions that map well to the model's assumptions. Just ensure you use the distribution (not earnings) and an appropriate growth rate and discount rate for the REIT sector.

This is educational content, not financial advice. Always do your own research before making investment decisions.